For the writers who feel like failures because they don’t read enough books.
Every writing community I’ve been in repeats the same line. “Readers are writers.” It’s said with such certainty that you start to feel like a fraud if you don’t keep up. That quote is repeated so often that people start treating it as a rule rather than a tendency.
Some writers are voracious readers. Some are observers. Some are storytellers first. Some are processors who write to make sense of life. And honestly, when you are balancing work, responsibilities, family, and everyday survival, reading can start to feel like another task on an already overloaded list.
But writing is still feeding you.
You are still studying human behavior. Still collecting dialogue. Still noticing tension, grief, silence, resilience, and contradiction. Still living inside the story. Because reading isn’t only something you do with a book.
Writers read people. We read faces, tone shifts, the pause before someone answers a hard question, and the body language that contradicts the words. We read rooms — who’s tense, who’s performing, who just got quiet. That kind of reading sharpens a writer just as much as a paragraph on a page.
Life itself becomes part of the material.
As writers, we often write from a deeply internal place. A lot of our work comes from reflection, emotional excavation, memory, and meaning-making. That is a different creative fuel source than someone writing purely from literary influence.
I’m not saying writers don’t need fuel. I’m saying the fuel sources are more varied than the maxim admits. Observation, memory, emotional excavation, and listening to how people actually talk in a grocery store line. Reading the look on someone’s face before they say what’s wrong. Catching the tone underneath the words. All of that is study. All of that is reading, just not the kind that comes bound between two covers.
The “readers are writers” crowd tends to collapse all input into one specific kind.
And here’s what the maxim misses: the reading of people never stops. You don’t put it down. You don’t finish a chapter and close the cover. Writers are reading people the entire time they’re alive — at the dinner table, in line at the pharmacy, in the silence after a hard conversation. That’s literacy too. And perhaps that matters most.
That said, reading books does help in specific ways — rhythm and pacing, sentence flow, structure, expanding vocabulary naturally, and reminding you what is possible on the page.
But it does not have to look like consuming 50 novels a year.
It can be:
- Essays before bed
- Audiobooks while driving
- One chapter at a time
- Poetry
- Medium or Substack pieces
- Memoir excerpts
- Listening to stories instead of physically reading them
A lot of writers quietly go through seasons where they produce far more than they consume.
Here is my truth: I don’t read books as much as I’d like. I spend most of my time writing. The rest of my time goes into work and the everyday business of being alive. But the writing keeps coming — because I read life every day.
✍️ From the Founder of Threads of Life, Money & Momentum.
Money & Momentum is dedicated to honest conversations about money mindset, earning more, and building income beyond a salary.
This is not about hype or get-rich-quick promises.
It’s about clarity, responsibility, identity shifts, and real momentum.
If you are here, it means one thing:
You are not just dreaming about money.
You are thinking about it, building it, questioning it, or earning it.
Check this and decide if this publication aligns with you.
🧵 Submit your story:
✨Send your story for review or request to become a writer(Comment your Medium ID)
To join this community, read these submission guidelines.
Writers are Readers, But Not of Books was originally published in Threads Of Life.🌿 on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.
Discover more from Yoli Kae Reynolds
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Be First to Comment